(FreedomWire.org) – Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, made his way back to the White House for a news briefing on Tuesday.

His return didn’t go quite as smoothly as White House officials were likely hoping it would, thanks to one adamant reporter.

According to Fox News, that reporter was Diana Glebova, the Daily Caller’s White House correspondent, whose questions prompted a scolding from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

Glebova attempted to ask Fauci about the origins of COVID before Jean-Pierre shut the line of inquiry down.

“We have a process here. I’m not calling out on people who yell. And you’re being … disrespectful to your colleagues, and you’re being disrespectful to our guest,” Jean-Pierre said.

“I will not call on you if you yell, and also you’re taking time off the clock because Dr. Fauci has to leave in a couple of minutes.”

Another reporter, Simon Ateba of Today News Africa, came to the defense of his fellow reporter.

As he spoke out, a bit of chaos ensued in the briefing room as numerous voices began to talk over one another.

“You need to call people across the room. She has a valid question. She’s asked about the origin of COVID,” Ateba said.

Jean-Pierre again doubled down.

“It is not your turn. It is not your turn,” Jean-Pierre said.

“I hear the question. I hear your question, but we’re not doing this the way you want it. This is disrespectful.”

“Simon, I’m done. Simon, I’m done. I’m done with you right now. … You’re taking time away from your colleagues.

It is strange that they won’t tolerate questions on the virus origin. Is it because Fauci funded the gain of function research in Wuhan that most likely created it?

(FreedomWire.org) – A Los Angeles judge has struck down L.A. Unified’s student COVID-19 vaccine mandate, ruling that the school district “exceeded its authority” and that “the power to require children to be vaccinated to attend school lies with the state.”

“The ruling, however, has no immediate effect within the L.A. Unified School District, because the district in May postponed its mandate until at least July 2023 — a move that aligned with the state decision to pause its own school vaccine requirement until then. LAUSD was the first of the nation’s largest school systems to institute a COVID-19 vaccination requirement for students, and despite the delay, school board members were resolute in defending it against lawsuits,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff’s ruling represented a significant win for “Let Them Breathe,” a California-based group that has opposed mask and vaccine mandates.

“Judge Beckloff’s ruling confirms that individual school districts do not have the authority to impose local vaccination requirements in excess of statewide requirements,” said Arie L. Spangler, a member of the legal team that pursued the case. “We are very pleased with the ruling, as it ensures that no child will be forced out of the classroom due to their COVID-19 vaccination status.”

“HUGE NEWS: A judge ruled this morning that LASchools’ student Covid vaccine mandate was illegal, blocking LAUSD from sending kids to independent study for not getting the Covid vaccine,” Reopen California tweeted.

“Even though LAUSD delayed their mandate to align with the state timeline, they still intended on excluding kids from in-person instruction if they did not get the Covid vaccine,” Reopen California added.

However, the ruling did not address the issue of employee vaccine mandates. The district’s enforcement of that requirement remains in effect.

“Beckloff wrote he had earlier thought that the school district’s student vaccine resolution fell short of a mandate because it affected only the manner of instruction and not the content. Unvaccinated students would have been transferred to online instruction under the policy. But in his ruling, Beckloff said the evidence presented persuaded him otherwise,” the LA Times reported. “The judge cited the example of D.F., a student who would have been forced to move from a magnet program that specialized in science to an online study program.”

“Thus, while the Resolution is a campus community health and safety measure, it also dictates who may be enrolled and continue to attend particular schools within the district,” the judge wrote in his nine-page decision.

“If D.F. remains unvaccinated, he will be required to leave his current school with its curriculum and programs to be enrolled in a new school within the district … where it appears his curriculum would be very different than at his current school. Thus, the Resolution is not merely about how education is delivered or who may be physically present on campus as the court previously viewed it. Instead, the Resolution dictates which school the student may attend, and the curriculum he may continue to receive.”

The court also noted that the state’s administrative process for adding a vaccine is “subject to a personal belief exemption.”

(FreedomWire.org) – Released documents from the CDC show that they plan to use phone data location to monitor schools and churches to see if people complied with COVID-19 lockdown orders. They wanted to use that data for many non COVID-19 purposes as well. The CDC bought access location data that was harvested from 10s of millions of phones in the United states in order to perform an analysis of compliance with curfews, people visiting K through 12 schools, and the effectiveness of lockdowns. The CDC used the COVID-19 pandemic as a reason to buy access to the data.

Each cell phone typically has a GPS location data. This information can be lifted from your phone. It can show where a person works, lives, shops, or even what addresses they visit on a regular basis. The CDC bought the data. Researchers have stated that location data can be used to track specific individuals.

The documents reveal that the CDC intended to use location data from SafeGraph. It paid SafeGraph $420,000 for access. The CDC stated that SafeGraph’s data was critical to their ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They noted that it had hourly monitoring of activity and curfew zones and detailed accounts of visits to participating pharmacies for vaccine. Using the data that SafeGraph provided, the CDC could watch in real time as people were violating curfews and taking the vaccine pushed by the administration.

The CDC appears to be using this data for COVID-19 but, it can also be used to study violence in certain areas, how many Americans actually bike to work, how many parents actually visit their kids school, how many people go to the grocery store weekly, and so much more. If the researchers are correct with this information. Then that means we don’t have privacy anymore in our day-to-day lives whatsoever, as long as we carry a cell phones.

The state of Florida is doing all it can to get back to normal following the restrictions that have been placed on stares during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recently, Governor Ron DeSantis urged Floridians to make “common sense” decisions regarding their health, get back to work, and live their lives without succumbing to fear.

All across the state, hair salons, restaurants, and other businesses are opening up. And Joe Biden? He’s furious and wants those responsible for living their lives — the citizens of Florida — to pay. Even though COVID cases are declining in Florida, Biden is considering placing draconian travel restrictions on the Sunshine State.

The Biden administration claims it is fearful of new variants of the virus, which spread much more easily than the initial strains. “There are active conversations about what could help mitigate spread here, but we have to follow the data and what’s going to work. We did this with South Africa, we did this with Brazil, because we got clear guidance,” a White House official said. “But we’re having conversations about anything that would help mitigate spread.”

While it is true that one of the new variants known as B.1.1.7 is heavily present in Florida, which is where nearly a third of cases have been identified in the U.S., the Biden administration is ignoring the overall drop in cases and considering placing travel restrictions like those placed on third-world nations on Florida.

“No decisions have been made, but we certainly are having conversations across government,” the official says.

DeSantis responded to this news, making it clear that he doesn’t feel his state’s citizens should be punished because a virus exists.

“Governor DeSantis opposes travel restrictions and does not believe diagnostic tests should be a prerequisite to domestic air travel,” a spokesperson for the Governor says.

It’s unclear if Biden will go through with the draconian restrictions, but it is apparent that states that didn’t vote for him are in danger of new rules that punish voters for not bending the knee to Democrats’ new king.

Have a health or psychological condition that makes wearing a mask problematic or even potentially lethal? Don’t agree with the dictatorial mask mandates, which are based on shaky science? You may not want to get on a plane in the near future — or a bus, subway, or train if the TSA is in charge of security checkpoints.

Western Journal reports that, thanks to a Biden executive order, the TSA will begin doling out massive fines to Americans who are caught not wearing masks:

The TSA has been picked to be the enforcement arm of a pair of federal mandates — one from the president and one from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — that require everybody taking any form of public transportation to wear a mask.

“Regarding the civil penalty fine structure for individuals who violate the Security Directive, TSA will recommend a fine ranging from $250 for the first offense up to $1,500 for repeat offenders,” the TSA announced on its website.

Most plane tickets cost less than $250 these days, and if you fly often and have a condition that prevents you from wearing a mask? $1,500 isn’t even the most you can be punished. “Based on substantial aggravating or mitigating factors, TSA may seek a sanction amount that falls outside these ranges,” the TSA announced at the end of last month.

“They will report violators to TSA and TSA may penalize those who refuse to wear a mask within the transportation networks,” TSA spokesman R. Carter Langston, told the The Washington Post. Every passanger over the age of 2 will be required to wear a mask. If you aren’t wearing a mssk and can’t or won’t put one on, you can be fined.

Specifics are vague, so TSA agents can easily pick and choose with this system. Ultimately, this is an attack on our most vulnerable Americans. Many among us have health problems that cause us to be unable to wear masks. This is yet another overreaching Democrat policy that is designed to appeal to their base, but is a failure in practice.